Legal Opinion
Crosby v. United States
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided February 14, 1995No. Civ. A. 5:93-CV-307PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION-ORDER
BILLINGS, Senior District Judge.
Cross motions for summary judgment and a motion to dismiss bring this matter to the Court’s attention. On October 31, 1994, Defendant United States of America moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. On December 9,1994, Plaintiff Elbert Crosby, Administrator of the Estate of Goodwin E. Crosby (“the Estate”), filed his own Motion For Summary Judgment simultaneously with his response to the United States’ Motion to Dismiss. The Court will address each motion in turn.
Factual Background
Goodw…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Arthur C. Ewing A/K/A A. Clifford Ewing Maxine H. Ewing v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- Lewyt Corp. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Crosby v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1995
- United States v. Tate & Lyle North American Sugars, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001