Legal Opinion
United States v. Tate & Lyle North American Sugars, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 24, 2001No. 97 Civ. 9113(RMB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BERMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the United States of America (“Plaintiff’ or the “IRS” or the “Government”), filed this action on or about December 10, 1997 to recover a $1,526,100.60 interest payment it erroneously made to defendant, Tate & Lyle North American Sugars, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Tate & Lyle,”) 1 , on or about September 24, 1993. Amstar seeks summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed.R.Civ.P.”) 56, asserting that the payment to Amstar was proper, and, in any event, the Government’s claim for recovery was asserted too late and is barred by the (two…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Domino Sugar Corporation, Tate & Lyle North American Sugars Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Sean M. DunnUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2025