Legal Opinion

State v. Halczyszak

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1986No. 85-538PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This case concerns the applicability of the plain view doctrine to the seizure of property not described in the search warrant. For the following reasons, we hold that the search inside the building does not offend the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The Fourth Amendment provides that:

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. State v. WaddyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. BraxtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. BarrOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API