Dinmark v. Farrier
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendants Michael Farrier, Jimmy Gibbs, and Wayne Dooley. On February 18, 1986, the plaintiff, Brenda Dinmark, filed a claim for false imprisonment against Michael Farrier and Hudson-Thompson, Inc. On March 17, she amended her complaint to add Jimmy Gibbs, Wayne Dooley, and Big Bear Super Foods. On March 28, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Hudson-Thompson, Inc., and on May 7, Big Bear Super Foods was dismissed. The facts surrounding this case are as follows:
On February 23, 1985, between 8:00 and 9:45…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
- Burgin v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Flack v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Yancey v. FarmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Wallace v. Phenix CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. FontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- McDowell v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- CNH America, LLC v. Ligon Capital, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.