Legal Opinion

Dinmark v. Farrier

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 2, 1987No. 85-1497PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of defendants Michael Farrier, Jimmy Gibbs, and Wayne Dooley. On February 18, 1986, the plaintiff, Brenda Dinmark, filed a claim for false imprisonment against Michael Farrier and Hudson-Thompson, Inc. On March 17, she amended her complaint to add Jimmy Gibbs, Wayne Dooley, and Big Bear Super Foods. On March 28, the trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Hudson-Thompson, Inc., and on May 7, Big Bear Super Foods was dismissed. The facts surrounding this case are as follows:

On February 23, 1985, between 8:00 and 9:45…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  2. Burgin v. SuggSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Flack v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Yancey v. FarmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Wallace v. Phenix CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. FontesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  2. Preferred Risk Mut. Ins. Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. McDowell v. KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. CNH America, LLC v. Ligon Capital, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API