Luther Williams, Jr., Inc. v. Johnson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Judge:
Appellant (plaintiff below) sought to recover $670 as liquidated damages under a contract for improvements on appellees’ home. Appellees’ defense was that the contract never came into existence because of an unfulfilled condition precedent. This appeal raises the sole question of whether the parol evidence rule required exclusion of all testimony regarding the alleged condition.
At the trial, Luther Williams, Jr., president of appellant corporation, testified that prior to the signing of the contract, he offered to arrange any necessary financing for appellees, but was advised…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Mitchell v. DavidDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Fadex Foreign Trading Corp. v. Crown Steel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Giotis v. LampkinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hercules & Co. v. Shama Restaurant Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- Flack v. LasterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Graybeal v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- Kupka v. MoreyAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.