State v. Ross
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLaeb, J.
There was no error in the denial of the defendant’s challenge to the array and motion to dismiss the special venire. The burden was upon the defendant to show the discriminatory exclusion of Negroes from the jury list, which he alleges as the basis for his motion and challenge. State v. Corl, 250 N.C. 258, 108 S.E. 2d 615. This he failed to do. On the contrary, his evidence is to the effect that there was no such discrimination. The Supreme Court of the United States has held that to select a jury panel from a list composed of persons whose names appear on the county tax lists, without…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. CorlSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. TippettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. ZunigaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. PeeleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. VickersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.