Legal Opinion

Frazier v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 3, 1949No. 44PublishedCited by 299 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rutledge

Petitioner’s primary complaint is that he has been denied the trial “by an impartial jury” which the Sixth Amendment guarantees. He was convicted of violating the Harrison Narcotics Act,1 by a jury composed entirely of employees of the Federal Government. One juror, *499Moore, and the wife of another, Root, were employed in the office of the Secretary of the Treasury, who is charged by law with responsibility for administering and enforcing the federal narcotics statutes.2 As against objections based on these facts and other matters, the Court of Appeals affirmed petitioner’s conviction and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by299 opinions

  1. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Ross v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Georgia v. McCollumSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. Martinez-SalazarSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

294 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API