Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Wade

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1889No. 537PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to District Court, Whitman County. Replevin brought by F. M. Wade against David Marsh to recover possession of a stock of goods. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Nash, J.

This was an action of replevin brought by the defendant in error in the court below to recover pos*539session of a stock of goods. He alleges in bis complaint tbat be bas a special property in said goods by virtue of a chattel mortgage from one J. L. Heatberly, given to secure certain notes wbicb were held by tbe defendant in error as agent of the owners, and wbicb be was authorized to secure; tbat, by tbe terms of said mortgage, tbe defendant in error was authorized to, and, in pursuance thereof, did, take immediate and exclusive possession of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cameron, Hull & Co. v. MarvinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881
  2. Hauselt v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Wood v. WeimarSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Frank v. MinerIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Hall v. . SampsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. LevyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Frick Co. v. OatsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Olsen v. National Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Silsby v. AldridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  5. People ex rel. Cooper v. FieldsNew York Supreme Court · 1869

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API