Legal Opinion
Smith v. Kemp
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 17, 1892PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error to Chippewa. (Steere, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
The court below directed a verdict for the plaintiffs in the sum of $4,485.33, upon the following memorandum of agreement:1
“This memorandum, made this 17th day of September,. A. D. 1886, by and between Charles R. Smith and William S. Smith, of Cheboygan, and George Kemp, of Sault Ste. Marie, all of the State of Michigan, witnesses as-follows:
“The said Charles R. and William S. Smith are at present the owners of the hotel known as the ‘Mullet Lake Hotel/ situated on Mullet lake, Cheboygan county, Mich., and hereby sell to the said George Kemp an undivided one-third interest in said hotel, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Richardson v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Hyde v. TenwinkelMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- Kinney v. RobisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by4 opinions
- Owen v. Meroney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Sheffler v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Malone v. KugelMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Campbell v. BaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1898