Kinney v. Robison
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Tan Burén. (Mills, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
Plaintiffs being a firm known as Kinney, Adams & Co., sued defendant for items of an account verified under the statute. Defendant put in a plea accompanied by a sworn statement of set-off in a larger amount. Defendant recovered judgment for a balance, and plaintiffs bring error.
Objection is made that there was no regular notice of set-off. This objection has no force. The set-off was not only claimed, but sworn to. By stipulation the correctness of both sides of the account was admitted, but the question of the admissibility of the set-off was left open.
It is claimed that it could not be…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kalamazoo Trust Co. v. MerrillMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Gauche v. MilbrathWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Wheeler v. HathewayMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Bates v. LaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Kinney v. TaborMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.