Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 31, 1955No. Civ. A. 8785PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant. Plaintiff’s complaint states two causes of action. The first cause of action alleges that the plaintiff was the owner of an automobile on which he was making monthly payments to defendant bank; that he was not in default; that he had possession of the car; that the defendant bank induced him to allow it to “repossess” the car on its promise that it would repair it and “reconvey” it to plaintiff; that this promise was made without any intention of performing it; and that the defendant bank has not “reconveyed” to plaintiff. Plaintiff also…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Orloff v. Metropolitan Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Shaw v. BernalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Bray v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. Marina City Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Myers v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Zeff v. Harvey Smith Oldsmobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API