Richard Houten, Jr. v. City of Fort Worth
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:
This will decide whether recent changes to the City of Fort Worth’s (the “City”) pension plan violate the law. Under certain circumstances, the Texas Constitution forbids reduction of public pension “benefits accrued by a person.” Tex. Const, art. XVI, § 66(d). Primarily, the plaintiffs argue that the City’s pension reforms violate this “Section 66.” Two district courts have already ruled in favor of the City, sparking two separate appeals. We hereby consolidate the plaintiffs’ appeals for decision and affirm.
BACKGROUND
Fort Worth operates a defined benefits pension plan…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ashish Patel, Anverali Satani, Nazira Momin, Minaz Chamadia, and Vijay Lakshmi Yogi v. Texas Department of Licensing and RegulationTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Holmes v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Spradlin v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hignell-Stark v. City of New OrleansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
- LaDonna Degan v. Bd of Trst of the Dallas PCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Larry Eddington, Vincent J. Aurentz, Roman Kilgore, and William J. Butler v. Dallas Police and Fire Pension System and George Tomasovic, in His Official Capacity as Board Chair, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2016
- Dallas Police Retired Officers Association v. Dallas Police and Fire Pension System and Nicholas A. Merrick in His Official Capacity as Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2023
- Hignell v. City of New OrleansDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.