Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Morales

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1996No. 95-1251PublishedCited by 227 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, Justice.

John B. Holmes, Jr., the Harris County District Attorney, filed this action in the trial court seeking a declaratory judgment that the Texas Open Records Act does not require a prosecutor to disclose “closed” criminal litigation files. The trial court found that the Open Records Act required disclosure, and the court of appeals affirmed. Holmes asserts that the Act categorically excepts his “closed” files from disclosure. We agree. We hold that section 552.108 of the Texas Government Code (The Open Records Act) excepts Holmes’ “closed” files from disclosure. Accordingly, we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jones v. StraussTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. RepublicBank Dallas, N.A. v. Interkal, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Simmons v. ArnimTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Etheridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  5. Houston Chronicle Publishing Co. v. City of HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by227 opinions

  1. Commissioners Court of Titus County v. AganTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. City of Garland v. Dallas Morning NewsTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Texas Municipal Power Agency v. Public Utility Commission of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. City of Amarillo v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Frost National Bank v. Burge, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000

222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API