Legal Opinion

Urben v. Public Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1961No. Docket 30, Calendar 49,071PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKavanagh, J.

Plaintiff sued the Public Bank, a Michigan banking corporation, and Joseph P. Verhelle, individually, tie relies on a-verbal agreement between himself and defendant bank’s officers.

Plaintiff’s declaration contained 2 counts. The first count, in assumpsit, was based on an oral agreement; the second count was on the common counts.

Defendants filed an answer claiming the acceptance of the final paycheck by plaintiff was in full release and satisfaction of all salary owed the plaintiff. Defendants also claimed the check was indorsed “Salary and overtime pay through August 14, 1958, plus 2 weeks’…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barringer v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Chapel v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Durkin v. Everhot Heater Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hoey v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Goldsmith v. LichtenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. S C Gray, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Fritz v. MarantetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  4. National Mutual Insurance v. Quality Builders, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Babcock v. Public BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API