Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Marantette

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1978No. 59605, (Calendar No. 8)PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blair Moody, Jr., J.

The plaintiff, John Fritz, orally agreed to sell 20,000 bushels of corn to the defendant, Bud Marantette, who purchased for resale to a Chicago broker. Defendant subsequently realized that it was not possible to obtain the contract price on the Chicago market, because the corn was not of the expected grade. Defendant checked the prevailing prices on the Toledo market and notified plaintiff that he could receive more on the Toledo market. The contract price for the Toledo market, to which the parties agreed, was approximately $24,000, $1.24 or $1.25 per bushel.

After the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Scholl v. TallmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. GMS, INC. v. Deadwood Social Club, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Baillie Lumber Co. v. Kincaid Carolina Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Kilander v. Blickle Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Gitre v. Kessler Products Co, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hoerstman General Contracting, Inc v. HahnMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Flambeau Products Corp. v. Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Chancellor, Inc. v. Hamilton Appliance Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  4. Van Sistine v. TollardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  5. Brown v. Coastal Truckways, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API