Legal Opinion
Smith v. Sinclair
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1976No. CIV-76-006-DPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
The plaintiff has filed herein an Amended Complaint in which he contends that the defendants have committed acts which violate various Civil Rights Statutes, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 and 1986. He asserts that jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4). Defendants have filed Motions to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment to plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. The plaintiff has responded thereto and requests an evi-dentiary hearing on the Motions.
After examining the files and records herein together with the Opinion of the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit in…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Bruszewski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Kauffman v. MossCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bruce B. Landrigan v. City of WarwickCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- Beeck v. KapalisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Philip D. Myers v. Clyde Harold BullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Cooper v. Parker-HugheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Willie McCurry v. Marvin Allen, Steven Jacobsmeyer, and Unknown Police Officers, St. Louis Police Department, St. Louis, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.