Petrofsky v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: This case comes before the court, having been submitted on the briefs and oral argument of plaintiff, pro se, and defendant’s attorney, on plaintiffs exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge Robert J. Yock, filed September 29, 1978, pursuant to Rule 134(h), and on plaintiffs motion, filed December 6, 1978, for an order to the defendant to produce documents. Upon consideration thereof, together with the responses and replies thereto, the court denies plaintiffs said motion to produce documents and since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Everett Plywood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- H. N. Bailey & Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Petrochem Services, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Hughes Communications Galaxy, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.