State v. Rainoldi
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for attempted felon in possession of a firearm. Defendant argues that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury that, in order to convict him, the jury had to find that, at the time he committed the alleged attempt, he knew he had been convicted of a felony. The state responds that we correctly held to the contrary in State v. Van Norsdall, 127 Or App 300, 873 P2d 345, rev den, 320 Or 131 (1994). Because the relevant law on this issue has developed since our decision in Van Norsdall, we agree with defendant and overrule that case. We therefore…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ButtreyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. RainoldiOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. ProphetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- State v. OliveCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. WierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.