Legal Opinion

Peacock v. . Greensboro

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action to recover damages, caused by the ponding of water on plaintiffs land, by means of a dam created by defendant in and across a stream, known as Reedy Fork. Plaintiff's land abuts on said stream.

Defendant is a municipal corporation and owns lands also abutting on Reedy Fork, below the land of the plaintiff. Defendant acquired and holds said land as a source of its water supply. For the purposes of increasing its water supply, and for other purposes, it has constructed dams on its lands in and across Reedy Fork.

The issues submitted to the jury were answered as follows:

"1. Did the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dayton v. . AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. Graham v. . CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Roberts v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  4. Barcliff v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Mitchell v. Town of AhoskieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Husband v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Lyda v. Town of MarionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Stephens Co. v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. Miller v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API