Legal Opinion

Mazo v. City of Detroit

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1968No. Docket 3,767PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.

From a denial by the Detroit common council of her petition for waiver of a zoning ordinance whose terms would prohibit the contemplated use of her leased premises as a bar, plaintiff sought relief in the circuit court, which decided that plaintiff had the right to use her premises as a bar.

The following issues are presented to this Court for review:

1. Whether the transfer of location of the liquor licenses added another bar to the area within the contemplation of the ordinance.

2. Whether the city is estopped to enforce its ordinance because of plaintiff’s reliance on unauthorized zoning…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Austin v. OlderMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Township of Pittsfield v. MalcolmMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Fass v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Indian Village Manor Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charter Township of Lyon v. Marlene HoskinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Commercial Auto Wrecking Corp. v. BoyleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. DeRose v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API