Legal Opinion

Charter Township of Lyon v. Marlene Hoskins

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 2016No. Docket 327685 and 327686PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The Petty and Hoskins families each own property in Lyon Township, which they use as their primary residences and the sites of their family-owned business operations. Their commercial uses have violated the township’s zoning ordinance since they opened shop. As the residential neighborhood developed around them, these uses became problematic, and the township enforced its ordinance by ordering a stop to the business activities. The circuit court, faced with competing summary disposition motions, upheld the township’s zoning authority. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The Petty and Hoskins families each…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. West v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Walsh v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Zaher v. MiotkeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Yankee Springs Township v. FoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Charter Township of Lyon v. Marlene HoskinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. Citizens Insurance Company of America v. Midwest Interiors LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Frank Sakorafos v. Charter Township of LyonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Susan Reaume v. Township of Spring LakeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Township of Williamstown v. Sandalwood Ranch LLCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API