Legal Opinion

DeRose v. City of Lansing

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 12, 1968No. Docket 4,783Published

1Opinion of the CourtFeneon, J.

Defendant, City of Lansing, appeals from a judgment entered December 5, 1967, ordering defendant to approve the relocation of plaintiff’s bar.

Paul DeRose, plaintiff, conducts a business at 228 North Washington Avenue, Lansing, Michigan, named Amedeo’s Bar, with a Class C liquor license, and dance entertainment permit. Plaintiff was requested in June, 1965, to relocate because of an urban redevelopment program encompassing his present establishment. Plaintiff-appellee applied to the liquor control commission for tranfer of location of his licensed business from 228 N. Washington to 111 W.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. Arcada Township BoardMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Hanson v. Romeo Village CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mazo v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API