Legal Opinion

Fass v. City of Highland Park

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1949No. Docket No. 57, Calendar No. 44,478PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

The bill of complaint in this case was filed on July 16, 1948, for the purpose of obtaining injunctive relief against the defendants. Said bill alleged that the plaintiffs were the owners of real property in the city of Highland Park which, under the zoning ordinance of the city, was located in a “B2” district; that during the years 1945, 1946, and 1947, licenses were issued to the plaintiffs under the provisions of a city ordinance relating to the sale of meat at retail, authorizing them to sell both dressed and live poultry on said premises; that on the 30th of June, 1948, plaintiff Mina…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Boyer-Campbell Co. v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. City of Lansing v. DawleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Adams v. Kalamazoo Ice & Fuel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Building Commissioner v. C. & H. Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  5. Board of County Commissioners v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Smith & Lee Associates, Inc., A/K/A Mortenview Manor, a Michigan Corporation United States of America v. City of Taylor, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Hughes v. Almena TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Township of Pittsfield v. MalcolmMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Township of West Bloomfield v. ChapmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. City of Hillsdale v. Hillsdale Iron & Metal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API