Legal Opinion

People v. Littlefield

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 28, 2018No. B280646PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBendix, J.

*1087Dylan M. Littlefield moved under the doctrine of laches to vacate a victim restitution order approximately 16 years after that order was entered and after Littlefield served his sentence for forgery. The trial court found it did not have jurisdiction to entertain Littlefield's motion. We agree and dismiss his appeal.

*1088FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Littlefield was charged with four counts of forgery.1 ( Pen. Code, 2 § 470, subd. (d).) He pled guilty to one count, and the remaining three counts were dismissed pursuant to a plea agreement. On January 5, 2000, the trial court sentenced…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. TurrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. People v. ScarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. People v. Dynes, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  2. People v. Saidy-Powell CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  3. People v. Tarkington CA2/3California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API