Legal Opinion
People v. Dynes
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 15, 2018No. F075158PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPoochigian, J.
*134*525INTRODUCTION
Defendant John Ray Dynes sent a request to the Superior Court of Fresno County regarding his potential eligibility for resentencing under Proposition 57. The court denied his request, and he filed this appeal. We dismiss the appeal because of the absence of an appealable order.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On December 19, 2013, defendant pleaded guilty to second degree robbery in case No. F13907336 ( Pen. Code, § 211 ); the record implies that he also admitted three prior prison term enhancements ( Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b) ).
On March 4, 2014, a felony complaint was filed in case No.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. WendeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- Teal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- People v. TurrinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- People v. MazuretteCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. Chamizo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Littlefield, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- (PC) Del Rio v. CatesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Valles v. GamboaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- In re NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.