Legal Opinion
Kirby v. City of Tacoma
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 5, 2004No. 29963-1-II, 30747-2-IIPublishedCited by 56 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
98 P.3d 827 (2004)
Joseph J. KIRBY and Deborah A. Kirby, husband and wife, Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF TACOMA, a municipal corporation; Ray Corpuz and "Jane Doe" Corpuz, husband and wife; Philip Arreola and "Jane Doe" Arreola, husband and wife; William Woodard and Catherine Woodard, husband and wife; Raymond Roberts and "Jane Doe" Roberts, husband and wife; David Brame and "Jane Doe" Brame, husband and wife; James Hairston and "Jane Doe" Hairston, husband and wife, Respondents.
Nos. 29963-1-II, 30747-2-II.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.
September 14, 2004.
Publication Ordered October 5,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- O'CONNOR v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
- Francisco Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, Erroneously Sued as Los Angeles County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Alonso v. Qwest Communications Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Fulton v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Saldivar v. MomahCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.