New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Carey
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in the above-entitled class action, except for New York State Association of Retarded Children (“NYSARC”), seek attorney’s fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988 for services rendered from the inception of the suit through April 1, 1980. 1 The facts of the case have been fully set forth in numerous opinions of this court, both published and unpublished, 2 familiarity with which is assumed. Briefly, the suit was brought in March, 1972 against New York State under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on behalf of retarded children and adults residing at Willowbrook Developmental…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- New York State Association for Retarded Children, Inc. v. Hugh L. Carey, Individually and as Governor of the State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- In Re S.T.N. Enterprises, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1987
- New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc. v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- In Re General Oil Distributors, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1985
- In Re Sapolin Paints, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.