Commonwealth v. DiNicola
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
An appeal by the Commonwealth from an order partially suppressing testimony of a hypnotically refreshed witness requires that we review and apply recent decisions to determine the admissibility of testimony from such a witness. The trial court suppressed the testimony of Deborah Sweet, a Commonwealth witness, to the extent that such testimony could not be verified by a prehypnotic statement made by the witness. We affirm.
On August 30, 1979, a fire consumed Deborah Sweet’s apartment in a two-story building in Erie, killing her two young children and an upstairs neighbor. Sweet,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Commonwealth v. DuggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. KichlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- People v. HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Commonwealth v. NazarovitchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. PollittSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Commonwealth v. StarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Liles v. BalmerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.