Legal Opinion
Oppenheimer v. Scarafile
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided July 12, 2022No. 2:19-cv-03590Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION David Oppenheimer, ) Civil Action No. 2:19-cv-3590 ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Michael C. Scarafile, Patricia R. Scarafile, ) ORDER AND OPINION Sheila G. Romanosky, and O’Shaughnessy ) Real Estate, Inc., d/b/a Carolina One Real ) Estate ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________ ) Before the Court are Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 85) and Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 87). Plaintiff filed an opposition in response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Rossignol v. VoorhaarCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- George F. Thompson v. Potomac Electric Power CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.