Legal Opinion
Town of Woodway v. Snohomish County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 7, 2013No. Nos. 68048-0-I; 68049-8-IPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.
¶1 — Under the Growth Management Act (GMA), chapter 36.70A RCW, a landowner’s development permit application vests to a local jurisdiction’s land use comprehensive plan provisions and development regulations at the time a complete application is filed, despite a Growth Management Hearings Board’s (Growth Board) later determination that the local jurisdiction did not fully comply with the State Environmental Policy Act’s (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, procedural requirements in its enactment of those plan provisions and regulations. Because BSRE Point Wells LP filed complete development permit…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- King County v. Central Puget SoundWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- King County v. Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Skagit Surveyors v. FRIENDS OF SKAGITWashington Supreme Court · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Town of Woodway v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2014
- Miotke v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Potala Village Kirkland, LLC v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Heritage Baptist Church v. Central Puget Sound Growth ManagementCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Kathy Miotke, V Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.