Goldfarb v. Campe Corp.
City of New York Municipal Court
Action on the commercial calendar of the City Court to recover general damages for the breach of two executory contracts for the sale of goods.
1Opinion of the CourtRansom, J.
This controversy turns upon several interesting questions as to the practical working out of the rule of the damages recoverable for so-called “anticipatory breach” of contracts to sell and deliver goods — questions owing their novel form, if not their origin, to recent calendar improvements which enable the plaintiff in a commercial action to have a trial, if he so desires, well within a month from the time his cause of complaint arises. In June and July of last year, the defendant entered into written contracts to make installment deliveries of thirty-nine cases of goods to the plaintiffs.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Roehm v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Dana v. . FiedlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Windmuller v. PopeNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Saxe v. . Penokee Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Harrison v. . GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caminetti v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Allied Canners & Packers, Inc. v. Victor Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Kokomo Steel & Wire Co. v. Republic of FranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
- Segall v. FinlayNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- Continental Cotton Co. v. MannCity of New York Municipal Court · 1921