Legal Opinion
Segall v. Finlay
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Page, Referee.
The negotiations for the sale of sugar by the defendants to the plaintiff were carried on by means of telephone conversations, which were confirmed by the defendants either by telegrams or letters. The parties have stipulated the receipt and contents of these telegrams. The principal questions of fact arise from statements alleged to have been made over the telephone. The parties had on February 19, 1923, entered into a contract for the sale of 3,000 tons of sugar, payment for which was guaranteed by the State Commercial and Savings Bank under the provisions of the contract, “…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Saxe v. . Penokee Lumber Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1899
- Second Nat. Bank v. Columbia Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
- Goldfarb v. Campe Corp.City of New York Municipal Court · 1917
- Schopflocher v. ZimmermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. MeerNew York Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- Madeirense Do Brasil S/A v. Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Val Decker Packing Co. v. Armour & Co., Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1960
- Madeirense Do Brasil S/A v. Stulman-Emrick Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945