Legal Opinion

Terral v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1968No. 5319PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Thompson, C. J.:

The controlling question is whether one may be lawfully convicted of the crime of larceny from the person when the property taken was near the victim but not on his person. We hold that the conviction is not authorized and must be set aside.

The record shows that Terral snatched gaming tokens of the value of $250 from a crap table rack immediately in front of the victim who was gambling at the Dunes Casino. For such conduct he was charged with grand larceny and also larceny from the person. The jury acquitted him of grand larceny, but found him guilty of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. State v. KobylaszSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  3. Wilder v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Banks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1946

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShambergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. People v. WarnerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. People v. Smith-AnthonyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. PierceIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. TrambleArizona Supreme Court · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API