Legal Opinion

State v. Tramble

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 4, 1985No. 6348-PRPublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Justice.

Quincy Tramble (defendant) was convicted of theft in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1802. His crime was classified as a class 6 felony rather than a class 1 misdemeanor because the theft was “from the person of another.” Id., subsection C. Defendant was alleged to have reached through the passenger window of a car which was stopped in traffic and grabbed a purse lying on the seat next to the woman driving the car. The trial judge instructed the jury that the elements of the crime of “theft from the person of another” existed if the property was taken “from [the] immediate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. DeBoer v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. AschmellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Terral v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShambergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Baker v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API