Legal Opinion

People v. Pierce

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 2007No. 103272PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Freeman, Fitzgerald, Garman, and Karmeier concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Kilbride specially concurred, with opinion.

OPINION

In this case, we must determine whether the modified jury instructions given at defendant’s trial accurately stated the law when they defined the offense of theft from the person to include a taking from the “presence” of the person. To make this determination, we must decide whether one commits the offense of theft “from the person” in Illinois when he steals property that is not in physical contact with the person. The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Carter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. HoppIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Town & Country Utilities, Inc. v. Illinois Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People v. ParkerIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. LovejoyIllinois Supreme Court · 2009
  2. People v. Smith-AnthonyMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Barth v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. JamisonIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. HartfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 2022

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API