State v. Keehn
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
After entry of Lyle Keehn’s criminal convictions, the district court ordered restitution for the victim and the Department of Human Services. On Keehn’s appeal from the restitution order, we hold that the Department of Human Services is a “victim” for purposes of restitution, but remand for further proceedings because the evidence supporting the order is not sufficiently specific to meet the statutory requirements.
FACTS
Lyle Keehn pleaded guilty to fifth degree assault and engaging in a pattern of harassing conduct. The conduct underlying his convictions involved ’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Achrem v. Expressway Plaza Ltd. PartnershipNevada Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- State v. HarwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. DillonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. TholeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In Re the Welfare of J.A.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. ArendsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Peter Loren Martel v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015