State v. Dillon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Jim Dillon for further review of the decision of the court of appeals be, and the same is, granted for the limited purpose of remanding the case to the court of appeals. Dillon, who stands convicted of three counts of drug crimes involving the sale of cocaine or the participation in the sale of cocaine, argued in his petition for review, inter alia, that the court of appeals incorrectly applied the harmless error standard in ruling that certain trial errors were harmless. Specifically, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. BolteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. StarkeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. VanWagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. KoppiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State of Minnesota v. Neal Curtis ZumbergeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- State v. TraylorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- State v. EslerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.