Legal Opinion
State v. Thole
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 11, 2000No. C5-99-2078PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Following his conviction of use of a motor vehicle without consent, appellant Randall James Thole challenges the district court’s order for restitution. Appellant claims the district court: (1) erred by ordering restitution for damages not caused by the offense for which he was convicted; and (2) abused its discretion in valuing the vehicle loss at $2,500.
FACTS
On February 10, 1998, appellant Randall James Thole went to his ex-girlfriend’s house, where he allegedly assaulted her before taking her 1988 Chevrolet Spectrum without her consent. After appellant departed,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State Ex Rel. Rasmussen v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Rairdon v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- State v. GliddenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- In Re the Welfare of D.D.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RamsayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. BauerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- In Re the Welfare of M.R.H.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.