Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Behrman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 2008No. 200,536-5PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

197 P.3d 1177 (2008)

In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING AGAINST Bradley G. BEHRMAN, an Attorney at Law.

No. 200,536-5.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 30, 2008.

Decided December 24, 2008.

Sachia Stonefeld Powell, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Bradley Galvin Behrman, Seattle, for Appellant.

OWENS, J.

¶ 1 Bradley G. Behrman appeals the Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) Disciplinary Board's (Board) recommendation that he be suspended for nine months, pay $500 in restitution, and undergo counseling. The hearing officer determined that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Proceeding v. NobleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WhittWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against WhittWashington Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. In Re Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGrathWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against StarczewskiWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against HicksWashington Supreme Court · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API