Legal Opinion

Karasik v. Pacific Eastern Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided August 6, 1935PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor :

The court is indebted to the master for the thorough and painstaking manner in which he has studied the record in this cause and given symmetry to what, but for his report, would appear to one who approaches it with no previous intimacy, a mass of tangled detail. The master’s report is of such character that the labor of the court in passing upon the exceptions is very much facilitated.

All the suits which the settlements propose to compromise involve the same subject matter. They are suits filed by stockholders of a Delaware corporation formerly known as The Goldman Sachs…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
  2. Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
  3. Finch v. Warrior Cement Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
  4. Davis v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
  5. Davis v. Louisville Gas Electric Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
  2. Cheff v. MathesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1964
  3. Weiss v. Kay Jewelry Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Bennett v. Breuil Petroleum Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
  5. Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API