Legal Opinion

Boatright v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 1, 1934PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C. J.

In the present case the City of Jacksonville, acting under the authority of Chapter 15772, Acts 1931, Laws of Florida, and Section 6 of Article IX of the Constitution of Florida as amended in 1930, proposed -to extend and continue the obligation of certain of its outstanding bonded indebtedness by the issuance of a series of refunding bonds described as “City of Jacksonville Refunding Bonds, Third Issue of 1934,” which it designed to be sold and the proceeds used to retire the outstanding indebtedness or, at the option of the existing bondholders, taken in exchange for the bonds to be…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  3. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. State ex rel. Hampton v. McClungSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  5. Louisiana v. PilsburySupreme Court of the United States · 1882

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Folks v. County of MarionSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. City of Winter Haven v. A. M. Klemm & SonSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. State v. City of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  4. State v. County of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. City of Miami v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API