Legal Opinion
City of Albuquerque v. Gott
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1964No. 7529PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARMODY, Justice.
The City of Albuquerque (appellee) sought mandamus to require the Director of the Department of Finance and Administration to approve a refunding bond proposal. The trial court, after hearing, ordered that a peremptory writ of mandamus issue, and it is from this action that this appeal results.
The real issue is whether the proposed refunding bonds are in violation of §§ 13 and 12 of art. IX of the New Mexico Constitution, since it is claimed that the amount of outstanding indebtedness will thus be increased so as to be in excess of the constitutional debt limitation and will…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Doon Township v. CumminsSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- City of Huron v. Second Ward Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- National Life Insurance v. MeadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Allison v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Heins v. LincolnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beaumont v. FaubusSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
- Application of Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- Bd. of Educ. of County of Hancock v. SlackWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- City of Carlsbad v. Northwestern National InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1970
- In re Board of Regents of the University of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.