Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. American Tie & Timber Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 8, 1914No. 180PublishedCited by 115 opinions

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE PIPTH CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the Federal courts of cases to recover damages against a railway company for refusing to accept interstate shipments without action first taken theréon by the Interstate Commerce Commission, are stated in the opinion. The Circuit Court did not have power to determine the issues and grant the relief prayed for under the facts disclosed by the record.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE PIPTH CIRCUIT. The facts, which involve the jurisdiction of the Federal courts of cases to recover damages against a railway company for refusing to accept interstate shipments without action first taken theréon by the Interstate Commerce Commission, are stated in the opinion. The Circuit Court did not have power to determine the issues and grant the relief prayed for under the facts disclosed by the record. The trial court should have instructed a verdict for the plaintiff in error. The damages of defendant in error caused by its consent to the…

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice White

Basing its cause of action on the Act to Regulate Commerce the American Tie ■& Timber Company, defendant in error, hereafter called the Tie Company, commenced suits in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas against the Texas & Pacific Railway Company, plaintiff in error, and the Kansas City Southern Railway Company to recover damages alleged to have resulted from the refusal of the railway companies to furnish, in September, October and November, 1907, cars for the loading of oak railway crossties at various points on the line of the railways in Arkansas and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Mitchell Coal & Coke Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Robinson v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States Ex Rel. Pitcairn Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  5. Morrisdale Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by115 opinions

  1. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API