Legal Opinion

Weinbaum v. Goldfarb, Whitman & Cohen

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 1996No. B085770PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.

The question in this case is whether an employee discharged in violation of public policy may seek damages on a conspiracy theory from third parties who conspired with his employer to cause the employee’s wrongful termination. Our answer is no, because a third party who is not and never has been the plaintiff’s employer cannot be bootstrapped by conspiracy into tort liability for a wrong he is legally incapable of committing.

Facts

George Weinbaum and Ash Amarshi (collectively Weinbaum), both audit managers, were fired by their employer, Goldfarb, Whitman & Cohen.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Moore v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reno v. BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Khajavi v. Feather River Anesthesia Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Maltz v. Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
  5. Phillips v. Gemini Moving SpecialistsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API