Legal Opinion

State v. Sweet

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1995No. 95-31PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

In State v. Campbell (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 38, 43, 630 N.E.2d 339, 346, we stated:

“A defendant who claims ineffective assistance [of counsel] must show deficient performance by counsel and resulting prejudice. Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 687, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064, 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 693.”

In his first proposition of law, appellant argues that his appellate counsel was ineffective for not raising the issue of the state’s having entered a nolle prosequi to the original indictments and the trial court’s dismissal of the indictments…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. CampbellOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Coleman v. McGettrickOhio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. RaberOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. RobbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. HawkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API