Legal Opinion

State v. Raber

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2012No. 2011-1383PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.

{¶ 1} Kyle Raber appeals from a judgment of the Ninth District Court of Appeals that affirmed his classification as a Tier I sex offender based on his guilty plea to one count of sexual imposition. At issue is whether the trial court retained authority to classify him as a Tier I sex offender more than a year after the entry of a final judgment of conviction for a sexually oriented offense.

{¶ 2} R.C. 2950.03(A)(2) directs a trial court to notify a sex offender of the duty to register as a sex offender at the time of a sentencing for a sexually oriented offense. However, pursuant to R.C.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. HoldcroftOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API