State v. Raber
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} Kyle Raber appeals from a judgment of the Ninth District Court of Appeals that affirmed his classification as a Tier I sex offender based on his guilty plea to one count of sexual imposition. At issue is whether the trial court retained authority to classify him as a Tier I sex offender more than a year after the entry of a final judgment of conviction for a sexually oriented offense.
{¶ 2} R.C. 2950.03(A)(2) directs a trial court to notify a sex offender of the duty to register as a sex offender at the time of a sentencing for a sexually oriented offense. However, pursuant to R.C.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. SimpkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by100 opinions
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Henderson (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. HoldcroftOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. WashingtonOhio Supreme Court · 2013
95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.