Legal Opinion

Crooks v. Harmon

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1905No. 1588PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeax from District Court, Utah County; Jno. E. Booth, Judge. Suit by Thomas Crooks against Thomas Harmon and another. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtBartch, C. J.

Tbe plaintiff brongbt tbis action to enjoin the defendants from selling certain real estate. He alleges that he is the owner of the property, and that the defendants, who are sheriff and deputy sheriff, respectively, are about to sell it under an execution issued upon a judgment in favor of D. N. Ad-amson and against William Crooks, James Crooks, and W. W. Mathews. The answer denies that the plaintiff is the owner of the property, and alleges that the real owner of it is James Crooks, one of the judgment debtors, and that the property was being sold in satisfaction of the judgment. At the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. . AldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Dawson v. SchlossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. De Molera v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Coveny v. HaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  5. McDonald v. ElfesIndiana Supreme Court · 1878

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hansen v. OwensUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Mitchell v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Stoddard v. FoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Superior Meat Products, Inc. v. HollowayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Carter v. Cummings-Nielson Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API