Legal Opinion

Stoddard v. Fox

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1909PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from tbe District Court of the Seventh Judicial District for the County of Canyon. Hon. Ed. L. Bryan, Judge. From a judgment in favor of the defendants plaintiff appealed, and assigned as error the insufficiency of the evidence. “A statement certified by the judge as correct is not open on appeal to the objection that it does not contain all the evidence.”

Read the full summary

APPEAL from tbe District Court of the Seventh Judicial District for the County of Canyon. Hon. Ed. L. Bryan, Judge. From a judgment in favor of the defendants plaintiff appealed, and assigned as error the insufficiency of the evidence. “A statement certified by the judge as correct is not open on appeal to the objection that it does not contain all the evidence.” (Richardson v. City of Eureka, 96 Cal. 443, 31 Pac. 458; Garrott v. Ratliff, 83 Ky. 384.) In the case at bar there is no appearance of any evidence having been omitted. The recital in the certificate that the bill of exceptions was…

1Opinion of the CourtAijlshie, J.

0Several motions have been presented in this case, and upon the hearing a motion to strike from the tran*706script certain parts thereof, which were not incorporated in-the statement or bill of exceptions, was granted. The matter thus stricken out is designated as a motion to vacate the verdict of the jury and grant a new trial, and to enter judgment. non obstante veredicto. Those matters do not form a part of' the judgment-roll, and cannot be brought to this court on appeal, except by statement or bill of exceptions.

A motion has been made to strike the bill of exceptions from the transcript, for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. King v. Pony Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Callahan v. HouckWyoming Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State v. ShepphardMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Adkins v. MonmouthOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Landt v. SchneiderMontana Supreme Court · 1904

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fenkell v. FenkellNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  2. B. J. Carney & Co. v. MurphyIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gropp v. HuyetteIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Aker v. AkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Leggett v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API