Legal Opinion

Billings v. Ralph E. Curtis & Son, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 19, 1979PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

Arnold N. Billings appeals from the pro forma affirmance by the Superior Court of the finding of the Workers’ Compensation Commission (WCC) that he was not an employee of Ralph E. Curtis & Son, Inc. (Curtis). When injured the appellant was driving a tractor-trailer leased to Curtis by one Leo Cote. Appellant argues that, as a matter of law, Curtis was his employer at the time because of certain regulations promulgated by the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC).

We disagree and deny the appeal.

FACTS

In order to be able to haul lumber in interstate commerce, Leo Cote leased…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Simmons v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. War Emergency Co-Op. Ass'n v. WidenhouseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  3. Jacobsky v. C. D'Alfonso & Sons, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  4. Bowen v. Maplewood Packing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  5. Gilbert v. MaheuxSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Billings v. Ralph E. Curtis & Son, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API