Legal Opinion
Los Angeles National Bank v. Bank of Canton
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 3, 1991No. B042986PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GEORGE, Acting P. J.
Appellant Los Angeles National Bank filed an action against respondent Bank of Canton of California seeking $2,257,965 in compensatory damages, plus punitive damages, for respondent’s alleged failure either to pay the face amount of, or notify appellant it would not honor, 28 checks prior to the “midnight deadline” established by the California Uniform Commercial Code, 1 and for conversion arising from respondent’s alleged wrongful failure to pay appellant the face amount of the checks. The superior court denied a motion brought by appellant for summary judgment,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Becker v. IRM Corp.California Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. NorwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Company Of New York v. American Savings And Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Burton v. Security Pacific Nat. BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Sheffield v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Santa Barbara Pistachio Ranch v. Chowchilla Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- FIRST NAT. BANK IN HARVEY v. Colonial BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Chicago Title Insurance v. California Canadian BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Nbt Bank, National Association v. First National Community BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Los Angeles National Bank v. Bank of CantonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.